When I signed up for the GLBT Challenge, I hoped to read not just more books with GLBT characters/authors in general, but in particular, I was looking for YA books that would fit these categories. I think I did fairly well on that this year. I signed up at the lambda level, which was four books, but I ended up reading seven. Here's my list:
- Ash by Malinda Lo
- Luna by Julie Anne Peters
- Libyrinth by Pearl North
- Will Grayson, Will Grayson by John Green and David Levithan
- Wildthorn by Jane Eagland
- Room by Emma Donoghue
- A Room of One's Own by Virginia Woolf
Of the seven, Room was definitely my favorite, though there are no GLBT characters and I didn't know Donoghue was a lesbian until after I had read the book. A Room of One's Own was a close second, and Will Grayson, Will Grayson was my favorite of the YA.
Although I found I mostly had to actively seek out books with GLBT protagonists, I was happy to see a number of books I read positively portrayed GLBT secondary characters. I didn't count these books towards the challenge, but they include:
- Zombies vs. Unicorns by various authors
- The Book of Lost Things by John Connolly
- The Shipping News by E. Annie Proulx
- The Ask and the Answer and Monsters of Men by Patrick Ness
I'm definitely glad I did this challenge, though I'll admit I put more time into searching for books in the beginning of the year than in the end. I spent a significant amount of time in the beginning looking for GLBT fantasy/sci-fi, but had a hard time finding much. It's something I'll continue to keep an eye out for.
I've always loved books, but "adult" life seemed to get in the way. Now I'm making time to read and falling in love all over again.
Showing posts with label GLBT Reading Challenge 2010. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GLBT Reading Challenge 2010. Show all posts
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Sunday, November 21, 2010
"A Room of One's Own" by Virginia Woolf
Summary: Woolf's essay on "women and fiction," in which she argues that in order for women to create, they need an income of five hundred pounds a year and a room in which they can write.
Musings: I somehow never was exposed to Woolf's classic essay before, and I regret that, though I think this reading came at a perfect time in my life. I'm not a terribly observant reader of most books, and I had to force myself to highlight, comment, and reflect when reading assigned works in college. However, as I read A Room of One's Own for the first time, I cursed the fact that I was reading a library copy. I was dying to mark lines and jot down my thoughts as I read. I turned over particular sentences in my head, read them aloud to my husband, and reread whole sections. I had to pull out a notepad in order to copy down all the gems I wanted to remember. In short, this fabulous feminist essay not only exposes the state of women in 1928, when Woolf was writing, but it also sheds significant light on the fight for equality between the sexes today.
Woolf's primary purpose in the essay is to address the lack of women writers throughout history and to understand what is necessary for a person to create fiction. One of her most potent arguments is that a person must have financial security in order to create. She notes, "Intellectual freedom depends upon material things. Poetry depends upon intellectual freedom. And women have always been poor, not for two hundred years merely, but from the beginning of time. Women have had less intellectual freedom than the sons of Athenian slaves. Women, then, have not had a dog's chance of writing poetry" (106). But it is not only the lack of financial means that have kept women from writing. Woolf argues that is is also the lack of history of women's writing from which to draw on and the lack of social support. Even for poor men, the world says, "Write if you choose; it makes no difference to me," but to women, "the world said with a guffaw, Write? What's the good of your writing?" (52). Woolf recognizes the popular conception that truly great writers produce regardless of circumstance, but she breaks down that false ideal easily.
A Room of One's Own is set during an interesting point in history, a time in which women had recently won the right to vote and were increasingly allowed access to wider range of educational and vocational opportunities. But, greater equality also results in a stronger backlash. Life is difficult, Woolf says, and self-confidence can come most easily by asserting one's superiority over another. So even as women were given more rights, their work and abilities were also being increasingly disparaged. Woolf argues, "Possibly when the professor insisted a little too emphatically upon the inferiority of women, he was concerned not with their inferiority, but with his own superiority. That was what he was protecting rather hot-headedly and with too much emphasis, because it was a jewel to him of the rarest price. ... How can we generate this imponderable quality [of self-confidence], which is yet so invaluable, most quickly? By thinking that other people are inferior to oneself" (34-35).
As I mentioned above, many of Woolf's arguments still hold sway today. Women still make, on average, less than men, and it is a lack of financial freedom that hampers greater equality. Although there are many more opportunities for women artists, there are still many arenas in which women lack a history and support network, and as a result, women are underrepresented. Even Woolf's discussion of the way in which women in literature are only depicted in relationship to men is still evident in many popular stories (just see the continued use of the "Bechdel test").
I had read the introduction to my edition of the essay first, which was a mistake, because it made me think Woolf's piece would be difficult and indecipherable, when in fact I found it especially accessible and pointed. A Room of One's Own is certainly a piece I want to return to, and I also hope to try some of Woolf's fiction in the near future.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010 and the Books of the Century Challenge.
Musings: I somehow never was exposed to Woolf's classic essay before, and I regret that, though I think this reading came at a perfect time in my life. I'm not a terribly observant reader of most books, and I had to force myself to highlight, comment, and reflect when reading assigned works in college. However, as I read A Room of One's Own for the first time, I cursed the fact that I was reading a library copy. I was dying to mark lines and jot down my thoughts as I read. I turned over particular sentences in my head, read them aloud to my husband, and reread whole sections. I had to pull out a notepad in order to copy down all the gems I wanted to remember. In short, this fabulous feminist essay not only exposes the state of women in 1928, when Woolf was writing, but it also sheds significant light on the fight for equality between the sexes today.
Woolf's primary purpose in the essay is to address the lack of women writers throughout history and to understand what is necessary for a person to create fiction. One of her most potent arguments is that a person must have financial security in order to create. She notes, "Intellectual freedom depends upon material things. Poetry depends upon intellectual freedom. And women have always been poor, not for two hundred years merely, but from the beginning of time. Women have had less intellectual freedom than the sons of Athenian slaves. Women, then, have not had a dog's chance of writing poetry" (106). But it is not only the lack of financial means that have kept women from writing. Woolf argues that is is also the lack of history of women's writing from which to draw on and the lack of social support. Even for poor men, the world says, "Write if you choose; it makes no difference to me," but to women, "the world said with a guffaw, Write? What's the good of your writing?" (52). Woolf recognizes the popular conception that truly great writers produce regardless of circumstance, but she breaks down that false ideal easily.
A Room of One's Own is set during an interesting point in history, a time in which women had recently won the right to vote and were increasingly allowed access to wider range of educational and vocational opportunities. But, greater equality also results in a stronger backlash. Life is difficult, Woolf says, and self-confidence can come most easily by asserting one's superiority over another. So even as women were given more rights, their work and abilities were also being increasingly disparaged. Woolf argues, "Possibly when the professor insisted a little too emphatically upon the inferiority of women, he was concerned not with their inferiority, but with his own superiority. That was what he was protecting rather hot-headedly and with too much emphasis, because it was a jewel to him of the rarest price. ... How can we generate this imponderable quality [of self-confidence], which is yet so invaluable, most quickly? By thinking that other people are inferior to oneself" (34-35).
As I mentioned above, many of Woolf's arguments still hold sway today. Women still make, on average, less than men, and it is a lack of financial freedom that hampers greater equality. Although there are many more opportunities for women artists, there are still many arenas in which women lack a history and support network, and as a result, women are underrepresented. Even Woolf's discussion of the way in which women in literature are only depicted in relationship to men is still evident in many popular stories (just see the continued use of the "Bechdel test").
I had read the introduction to my edition of the essay first, which was a mistake, because it made me think Woolf's piece would be difficult and indecipherable, when in fact I found it especially accessible and pointed. A Room of One's Own is certainly a piece I want to return to, and I also hope to try some of Woolf's fiction in the near future.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010 and the Books of the Century Challenge.
Friday, November 5, 2010
"Room" by Emma Donoghue
Summary: Room is where Jack, who has just turned five, lives with Ma. For Jack, Room is all there is in the world. It was where he was born, and he has no idea that Ma came from Outside. In fact, his mother was kidnapped as a college student and placed in Room (an outside shed) by her kidnapper, and she has lived there ever since. Room is narrated by Jack as he slowly begins to learn that there is more to the world than Room.
Musings: My summary in no way does justice to the beautiful and disturbing novel by Donoghue. From the beginning, the reader sees the world through Jack's eyes. For Jack, Room is not good or bad--it simply is the entirety of existence. Although they have a TV, his Ma has told him that the life captured on TV is fantasy. He knows of no other life, and it's heartbreaking to see his Ma try to conceal her struggles from a son who happily accepts his life.
Jack's curiosity, intelligence, and bravery are clearly a testament to the strength of his mother's love. Locked for seven years in a small room, his mother has nonetheless eked out a semblance of a "normal" childhood for Jack. Yet she has done so at a great personal cost. Not only does she continue to endure the night-time visits of her kidnapper, "Old Nick," but she also combats loneliness and despair, all for the love of her child.
Room is a book about growing up and accepting the good and the bad that come along with it. Jack is a wonderful character to take this journey with.
This is one of those books that I adored and would highly recommend to others, though I can't seem to find the right words to talk about it here.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
Musings: My summary in no way does justice to the beautiful and disturbing novel by Donoghue. From the beginning, the reader sees the world through Jack's eyes. For Jack, Room is not good or bad--it simply is the entirety of existence. Although they have a TV, his Ma has told him that the life captured on TV is fantasy. He knows of no other life, and it's heartbreaking to see his Ma try to conceal her struggles from a son who happily accepts his life.
Jack's curiosity, intelligence, and bravery are clearly a testament to the strength of his mother's love. Locked for seven years in a small room, his mother has nonetheless eked out a semblance of a "normal" childhood for Jack. Yet she has done so at a great personal cost. Not only does she continue to endure the night-time visits of her kidnapper, "Old Nick," but she also combats loneliness and despair, all for the love of her child.
Room is a book about growing up and accepting the good and the bad that come along with it. Jack is a wonderful character to take this journey with.
This is one of those books that I adored and would highly recommend to others, though I can't seem to find the right words to talk about it here.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
"Wildthorn" by Jane Eagland
Summary: Louisa Cosgroves believes she is being taken to be a companion to a woman in a wealthy family, but when her carriage arrives at Wildthorn, an asylum for the mentally insane, Lousia is suddenly thrust into deplorable conditions and told her name is Lucy Childs. As Louisa struggles to stay sane at Wildthorn, she thinks back to her childhood and her desire to be a doctor. Slowly, Louisa realizes she has not been admitted by mistake, and that something in her past has lead her loved ones to turn on her.
Musings: I very much wanted to like Wildthorn, primarily because of its young lesbian protagonist. Given the time period of the novel, there were so many questions that could be explored. What would it be like to realize you were attracted to girls when you wouldn't even know the name for that kind of relationship? How would you construct your identity when a core part of yourself would always have to be hidden?
Unfortunately, while Wildthorn does take a somewhat new approach to the historical romance genre, its over-reliance on cliched characters and storytelling has led an uninspiring and dull read. Stock characters? You got them: a nasty brother, a doting but somewhat clueless father who dies, a Nurse Ratched asylum nurse. And, worst of all, a protagonist with no real flaws and no nuance of character. Stock setting? An insane asylum where the patients aren't really insane, the staff are abusive, and the conditions deplorable. Stock themes? Women were oppressed, and it wasn't fair. Heck, I'm a feminist, and I couldn't help but roll my eyes at many of the conversations, which went something like this:
The romance was welcome, as it was the only unique part of the book, but it came about too suddenly. I never felt invested in it, and it wasn't enough to save the book for me. I realize I'm coming across harsh, and I'll admit that perhaps the book might be more interesting to younger readers completely unfamiliar with the way mental illness was treated or the lack of opportunities open to women in the Victorian era.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
E-galley received by the publisher through Net Galley for my honest review.
Musings: I very much wanted to like Wildthorn, primarily because of its young lesbian protagonist. Given the time period of the novel, there were so many questions that could be explored. What would it be like to realize you were attracted to girls when you wouldn't even know the name for that kind of relationship? How would you construct your identity when a core part of yourself would always have to be hidden?
Unfortunately, while Wildthorn does take a somewhat new approach to the historical romance genre, its over-reliance on cliched characters and storytelling has led an uninspiring and dull read. Stock characters? You got them: a nasty brother, a doting but somewhat clueless father who dies, a Nurse Ratched asylum nurse. And, worst of all, a protagonist with no real flaws and no nuance of character. Stock setting? An insane asylum where the patients aren't really insane, the staff are abusive, and the conditions deplorable. Stock themes? Women were oppressed, and it wasn't fair. Heck, I'm a feminist, and I couldn't help but roll my eyes at many of the conversations, which went something like this:
Louisa: I want to be a doctor!
Other character: Oh, how shocking! But you can't be!
Louisa: Why not?!
Other character: Because you're a woman! And women can't be doctors!
Louisa: It's not fair! Women can be doctors!
Other character: [blatantly obvious stereotype against women]
Louisa: [whines and gets angry]There was no subtlety of character or plot. The evil characters were obviously evil (the asylum nurse Weeks was the worst), and the good characters obviously good. The explanation for everything at the end seemed contrived and unrealistically complex.
The romance was welcome, as it was the only unique part of the book, but it came about too suddenly. I never felt invested in it, and it wasn't enough to save the book for me. I realize I'm coming across harsh, and I'll admit that perhaps the book might be more interesting to younger readers completely unfamiliar with the way mental illness was treated or the lack of opportunities open to women in the Victorian era.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
E-galley received by the publisher through Net Galley for my honest review.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
"Will Grayson, Will Grayson" by John Green and David Levithan
Summary: Will Grayson has always lived in the shadow of his friend Tiny, "the world's largest person who is really, really gay, and also the world's gayest person who is really, really large" (3). Although they've been best friends for years, Will is increasingly annoyed at being dragged along by Tiny, his plans for his musical called Tiny Dancer, and his plans to hook Will up with a girl named Jane. Meanwhile, across town, will grayson hates his life. His only solace is his online relationship with a boy named Issac, the only person who knows will is gay. When Will and will unexpectedly meet, their relationships become tied up together, and both Wills begin to be forced to actually make decisions in their lives.
Musings: Will Grayson, Will Grayson was a fun book that combines humor and adolescent angst in a way that feels real and poignant. Each Will is a distinct character. Will has gotten through life by staying in the shadows, and although he doesn't regret writing a letter to the school paper in defense of Tiny, he's determined to avoid any other changes in life by never committing or offering opinions. will is full of stereotypical "emo" angst, but I mostly found his cynicism funny because I totally know students like that. Musing on his mom's attempt to engage in morning conversation, will thinks:
The issues of first love, high school relationships, and coming out are done well. I liked that we see a range of gay characters with different personalities. The depths and importance of male friendships are acknowledged in a way that I imagine few teenagers would be willing to admit, but they are very sweet.
***This book qualities for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010 and the TwentyTen Reading Challenge ("Win! Win!" category).
Musings: Will Grayson, Will Grayson was a fun book that combines humor and adolescent angst in a way that feels real and poignant. Each Will is a distinct character. Will has gotten through life by staying in the shadows, and although he doesn't regret writing a letter to the school paper in defense of Tiny, he's determined to avoid any other changes in life by never committing or offering opinions. will is full of stereotypical "emo" angst, but I mostly found his cynicism funny because I totally know students like that. Musing on his mom's attempt to engage in morning conversation, will thinks:
i feel bad for her -- i do. a damn shame, really, that i had to have a mother. it can't be easy having me for a son. nothing can prepare someone for that kind of disappointment. (23)Tiny is the world around which each boy revolves, and the reader can't help but adore Tiny. He's so full of life and love for everyone, and despite the growth of the Wills in the novel, it's Tiny who's the standout character.
The issues of first love, high school relationships, and coming out are done well. I liked that we see a range of gay characters with different personalities. The depths and importance of male friendships are acknowledged in a way that I imagine few teenagers would be willing to admit, but they are very sweet.
***This book qualities for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010 and the TwentyTen Reading Challenge ("Win! Win!" category).
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
"Libyrinth" by Pearl North
Summary: Haly has been a clerk in the Libyrinth since she was born, but while all the members of the Libyrinth are dedicated to the books within their care, Haly is the only who can hear the books--they speak to her, even without being opened. For years the Libyrinth has been threatened by the Eradicants, a group of people who fear the written word, annually burning books, and rely on singing for all information. Both groups are after the fabled Book of the Night, which will give the holder information of great power. When Haly learns of a plot to steal the book, she sets off from the Libyrinth with her friend Clauda and the Libryarian Selene. However, both Haly and Clauda will be more important to the future than anyone could have imagined.
Musings: Although I found mostly middling reviews on Libyrinth, I was intrigued by North's use of literature throughout the young adult novel. The books speak to Haly, and these are not unknown books, but books we are all familiar with: Anne Frank's Diary of a Young Girl, Lord of the Flies, and Charlotte's Web, just to name a few. I had a hoped for a kind of YA-Thursday Next (albeit without the humor), and I was in that sense somewhat disappointed. Although quotes from novels pepper Libyrinth intermittently and speak apropos to Haly's current situation, they didn't feel like a fully integrated part of the book.
Haly and Clauda were somewhat generic characters for me, and although I wished them success, I didn't feel especially connected to them either. The novel does largely succeed, however, in its commentary on the power and dangers of knowledge, and North was able to take a slightly different approach to censorship. The Libryarian's rightly treasure books and the knowledge they possess, but they also hoard that knowledge, keeping it only for the elite within the Libryrinth. The Eradicants (or Singers) fear literacy and destroy books, but through singing they ensure that all people have equal access to information. Of course, both groups must come together in the end. The reconciliation is perhaps overly optimistic (and, for me, a bit cheesy), but the message is nonetheless valid.
Unexpectedly, this book qualifies for both the POC Reading Challenge and the GLBT Reading Challenge. I had been looking for books in the sci-fi/fantasy realm for those challenges, so it was especially exciting to unknowingly find one that fit both. Haly is part Thesian, a group of dark-skinned people, and numerous Thesian characters are in the novel (the cover also seems to depict Haly well!). Clauda is a lesbian, and although her sexuality is not a large part of the book, same sex relationships are periodically mentioned and are clearly an accepted part of this society.
In the end, Libyrinth wasn't a favorite, but I liked it more than I thought I would after reading a few other reviews.
***This book qualifies for the POC Reading Challenge and the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
Musings: Although I found mostly middling reviews on Libyrinth, I was intrigued by North's use of literature throughout the young adult novel. The books speak to Haly, and these are not unknown books, but books we are all familiar with: Anne Frank's Diary of a Young Girl, Lord of the Flies, and Charlotte's Web, just to name a few. I had a hoped for a kind of YA-Thursday Next (albeit without the humor), and I was in that sense somewhat disappointed. Although quotes from novels pepper Libyrinth intermittently and speak apropos to Haly's current situation, they didn't feel like a fully integrated part of the book.
Haly and Clauda were somewhat generic characters for me, and although I wished them success, I didn't feel especially connected to them either. The novel does largely succeed, however, in its commentary on the power and dangers of knowledge, and North was able to take a slightly different approach to censorship. The Libryarian's rightly treasure books and the knowledge they possess, but they also hoard that knowledge, keeping it only for the elite within the Libryrinth. The Eradicants (or Singers) fear literacy and destroy books, but through singing they ensure that all people have equal access to information. Of course, both groups must come together in the end. The reconciliation is perhaps overly optimistic (and, for me, a bit cheesy), but the message is nonetheless valid.
Unexpectedly, this book qualifies for both the POC Reading Challenge and the GLBT Reading Challenge. I had been looking for books in the sci-fi/fantasy realm for those challenges, so it was especially exciting to unknowingly find one that fit both. Haly is part Thesian, a group of dark-skinned people, and numerous Thesian characters are in the novel (the cover also seems to depict Haly well!). Clauda is a lesbian, and although her sexuality is not a large part of the book, same sex relationships are periodically mentioned and are clearly an accepted part of this society.
In the end, Libyrinth wasn't a favorite, but I liked it more than I thought I would after reading a few other reviews.
***This book qualifies for the POC Reading Challenge and the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
"Luna" by Julie Anne Peters
Summary: Regan has always been there to support her older brother Liam, even though that means getting no sleep, as by night, Liam becomes Luna, the girl he has always felt himself to be. Weighed down by keeping the secret from her parents and her new crush Chris, Regan begins to feel her life is on hold because of her transgendered brother's needs. When Liam decides he wants to transition full-time, Rachel isn't sure how far she can support Luna.
Musings: This is the second YA book I've read for the GLBT Reading Challenge, and it does an excellent job of describing the feelings of and challenges for a young transgendered person. Regan and Liam act as important foils for one another. Regan envies Liam for his brains and relative popularity while Liam envies Regan for always being treated as the girl she was born into. The siblings are co-dependent on one another, and by the end of the book, each must realize her own autonomy in order to be happy.
Some of the information on transgendered people and the gender identity spectrum is pretty basic, but it is probably appropriate for a younger audience who may be less familiar with the issues. Peters acknowledges a range of reactions to Luna while also emphasizing the importance of respecting Luna's need to be who she is.
Although the issues are treated in a sensitive way, the story itself felt a bit simplistic. Many characters seemed overly sexist (at least for 2004, when the book was written), and the parallels between Regan and Liam's mother (yearning to break free from the role of a housewife) and Liam were a little too obvious. Regan's crush, Chris, is sweet, but he is too perfect and caring for a high school student. Liam is a huge computer geek (he builds PCs and designs video games), so I was also a little surprised that the online transgendered community didn't play a larger role earlier in his life.
Luna would be a good read for anyone interested in learning more about the mindset of a transgendered person or for anyone looking to be an ally to a transgendered person.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
Musings: This is the second YA book I've read for the GLBT Reading Challenge, and it does an excellent job of describing the feelings of and challenges for a young transgendered person. Regan and Liam act as important foils for one another. Regan envies Liam for his brains and relative popularity while Liam envies Regan for always being treated as the girl she was born into. The siblings are co-dependent on one another, and by the end of the book, each must realize her own autonomy in order to be happy.
Some of the information on transgendered people and the gender identity spectrum is pretty basic, but it is probably appropriate for a younger audience who may be less familiar with the issues. Peters acknowledges a range of reactions to Luna while also emphasizing the importance of respecting Luna's need to be who she is.
Although the issues are treated in a sensitive way, the story itself felt a bit simplistic. Many characters seemed overly sexist (at least for 2004, when the book was written), and the parallels between Regan and Liam's mother (yearning to break free from the role of a housewife) and Liam were a little too obvious. Regan's crush, Chris, is sweet, but he is too perfect and caring for a high school student. Liam is a huge computer geek (he builds PCs and designs video games), so I was also a little surprised that the online transgendered community didn't play a larger role earlier in his life.
Luna would be a good read for anyone interested in learning more about the mindset of a transgendered person or for anyone looking to be an ally to a transgendered person.
***This book qualifies for the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
"Ash" by Malinda Lo
Summary: In this retelling of "Cinderella," Ash grew up hearing stories of fairies from her mother. When her mother dies and her father then dies shortly after remarrying, Ash is forced to move in with her mean stepmother and stepsisters back in the city. Nevertheless, Ash still finds herself drawn to the Woods and the fairy Sidhean while also feeling connection to the King's Huntress, Kaisa.
Musings: I picked this book up on recommendation from Angela at Bookish Blather, and it was also a good book with which to begin the GLBT Challenge 2010 that I signed up for yesterday.
This Cinderella story is not just a feminist retelling, for it seeks to subvert the traditional role of romance in fairy tales. In fact, the Prince plays little role in the story, and the relationships are instead centered between Sidhean and Kaisa. When it comes time for Ash to make her choice, the choice is obvious. Although there is attraction to Sidhean because of his power and and allure as a fairy, there is not love--just a feeling of being consumed. With Kaisa there is respect and mutual acknowledgment, and it's great to see Ash take agency for whom she will love at the end of the novel.
I enjoyed the set-up of this story. It borrowed from Cinderella without feeling weighed down by sticking too closely to the well-known story. By taking the focus away from the Prince, Lo is able to give attention to the fairy world and the Huntress' world.
Nevertheless, I just couldn't get into the book. It felt far too short to cover all that happens and to fully go into the world Lo has created. The novel begins when Ash is twelve, and a hundred pages later, she is already eighteen. It felt as though I was reading a summary of all that happened rather than an actual book. I wanted more of what Ash was thinking or how she was feeling. The twelve-year-old Ash didn't seem much different than the eighteen-year-old.
Ash's relationship with Sidhean seemed to come suddenly, and I didn't fully understand the fairy world. The descriptions of Sidhean also sounded so similar to the current typical descriptions of vampires that I found it hard to think of him otherwise.
The most compelling part of the novel is Ash's relationship with Kaisa, and I wish there had been more time spent on them. (And by the way, what's with all these similar sounding names? Hunger Games' Katniss, Graceling's Katsa, Ash's Kaisa) Ash's ending with Sidhean didn't quite fit together with me, but I loved the way she came to Kaisa.
*** Whew! This book qualifies for the TwentyTen Reading Challenge (Bad Bloggers category), the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010, and the POC Reading Challenge.
Musings: I picked this book up on recommendation from Angela at Bookish Blather, and it was also a good book with which to begin the GLBT Challenge 2010 that I signed up for yesterday.
This Cinderella story is not just a feminist retelling, for it seeks to subvert the traditional role of romance in fairy tales. In fact, the Prince plays little role in the story, and the relationships are instead centered between Sidhean and Kaisa. When it comes time for Ash to make her choice, the choice is obvious. Although there is attraction to Sidhean because of his power and and allure as a fairy, there is not love--just a feeling of being consumed. With Kaisa there is respect and mutual acknowledgment, and it's great to see Ash take agency for whom she will love at the end of the novel.
I enjoyed the set-up of this story. It borrowed from Cinderella without feeling weighed down by sticking too closely to the well-known story. By taking the focus away from the Prince, Lo is able to give attention to the fairy world and the Huntress' world.
Nevertheless, I just couldn't get into the book. It felt far too short to cover all that happens and to fully go into the world Lo has created. The novel begins when Ash is twelve, and a hundred pages later, she is already eighteen. It felt as though I was reading a summary of all that happened rather than an actual book. I wanted more of what Ash was thinking or how she was feeling. The twelve-year-old Ash didn't seem much different than the eighteen-year-old.
Ash's relationship with Sidhean seemed to come suddenly, and I didn't fully understand the fairy world. The descriptions of Sidhean also sounded so similar to the current typical descriptions of vampires that I found it hard to think of him otherwise.
The most compelling part of the novel is Ash's relationship with Kaisa, and I wish there had been more time spent on them. (And by the way, what's with all these similar sounding names? Hunger Games' Katniss, Graceling's Katsa, Ash's Kaisa) Ash's ending with Sidhean didn't quite fit together with me, but I loved the way she came to Kaisa.
*** Whew! This book qualifies for the TwentyTen Reading Challenge (Bad Bloggers category), the GLBT Reading Challenge 2010, and the POC Reading Challenge.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
GLBT Challenge 2010 and Persons of Color Reading Challenge
So I'm already nervous about signing up for more challenges, but these are two I've really wanted to do (they're the last ones, though!). I know I naturally gravitate towards some books and not others, but I don't often consciously think about the choices I'm making in what I read. Hopefully these challenges will help me choose books I might otherwise miss. I'd especially like to think about YA literature that fits these categories. Most of the books I read last year with authors or protagonists of color were adult books, and up until this year, I don't think I'd read any YA with prominent GLBT characters. I recommend a lot of books to my students, and I want to be more representative in the suggestions I'm giving.
GLBT Challenge 2010: The basic idea of this challenge is to read books about GLBT topics and/or by GLBT authors.
This is not something I did very well on last year. I'm signing up at the lambda level (four books), but I'm hoping to go above that.
Books Read:
Persons of Color Reading Challenge: Commit to reading POC characters and authors.
This challenge came from all the recent cover controversy. By my quick count, I read about twenty books last year with authors or protagonists of color. I'm signing up at level four (10-15 POC books), but, again, I think I'll be able to go above.
Books Read:

This is not something I did very well on last year. I'm signing up at the lambda level (four books), but I'm hoping to go above that.
Books Read:
- Ash by Malinda Lo
- Luna by Julie Anne Peters
- Libyrinth by Pearl North
- Will Grayson, Will Grayson by John Green and David Levithan
- Wildthorn by Jane Eagland
- Room by Emma Donoghue
- A Room of One's Own by Virginia Woolf
Persons of Color Reading Challenge: Commit to reading POC characters and authors.

Books Read:
- Ash by Malinda Lo
- The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck
- The Girl Who Fell from the Sky by Heidi W. Durrow
- Kindred by Octavia Butler
- Liar by Justine Larbalestier
- Marcelo in the Real World by Francisco X. Stork
- Libyrinth by Pearl North
- Monique and the Mango Rains by Kris Holloway
- Bloodchild by Octavia Butler
- The Freedom Writers Diary by the Freedom Writers and Erin Gruwell
- Unaccustomed Earth by Jhumpa Lahiri
- A Map of Home by Randa Jarrar
- Finding Nouf by Zoe Ferraris
- The Help by Kathryn Stockett
- The Intuitionist by Colson Whitehead
- Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro
- The Color of Water by James McBride
- The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot
- The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro
- The Warmth of Other Suns by Isabel Wilkerson
- Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)